FARC dissident factions clash in Colombian Amazon, leaving 48 dead

At least 48 rebels killed in armed clashes; civilian population trapped in crossfire with restricted access to rescue operations in remote, mine-laden terrain.
Bodies piled in the field, waiting for permission to be retrieved
Rescue teams cannot reach the remote Guaviare region without approval from the armed groups controlling it.

En las profundidades de la Amazonía colombiana, donde el Estado llega tarde y la ley la imponen quienes portan armas, al menos 48 rebeldes murieron en combates entre facciones disidentes de las extintas FARC, disputándose el control de rutas de cocaína y minería ilegal en el departamento del Guaviare. Los cuerpos permanecieron tendidos en el campo, inaccesibles para los equipos de rescate, mientras la violencia más intensa en una década sacudía al país a días de sus elecciones presidenciales del 31 de mayo. Lo que ocurrió en ese rincón remoto no es solo una batalla criminal: es el eco de una paz incompleta, donde la firma de un acuerdo no bastó para cerrar las heridas que alimentan la guerra.

  • Dos facciones rivales surgidas de las FARC —una liderada por el criminal más buscado del país, Iván Mordisco, y otra por el comandante conocido como Calarcá— se enfrentaron con una violencia que dejó 48 muertos y cuerpos sin poder ser recuperados en campo abierto.
  • Civiles atrapados en sus casas grababan desde el interior el sonido de los disparos, mientras los grupos armados imponían toques de queda y restricciones de movimiento sobre la población local.
  • El ejército intentó llegar en helicóptero, pero el mal clima lo impidió; las tropas terrestres avanzaban lentamente hacia una zona que se sospecha sembrada de minas antipersona, y los rescatistas debían esperar permiso de los propios grupos armados para ingresar.
  • El ministro de Defensa calificó la situación de 'inconcebible y absurda', mientras la oposición usaba la masacre como argumento electoral contra la política de paz negociada del presidente saliente Gustavo Petro.
  • Colombia enfrenta su peor ola de violencia en una década —secuestros, asesinatos, atentados— y la seguridad se ha convertido en el eje central de una elección presidencial que se celebra en apenas días.

Cuarenta y ocho rebeldes murieron en el Guaviare colombiano tras días de combates entre dos facciones disidentes de las extintas FARC. Los cuerpos quedaron tendidos donde cayeron, en una región remota a seis horas en cuatro por cuatro del pueblo más cercano. El alcalde de San José del Guaviare describió la escena a la prensa internacional: cadáveres en el campo, sin posibilidad aún de ser evacuados. Desde el interior de sus casas, civiles atrapados grababan el sonido de los disparos.

El enfrentamiento estalló entre el grupo de Iván Mordisco —el criminal más buscado del país— y el del comandante conocido como Calarcá. Lo que los separaba no era ideología, sino dinero: el control de las rutas del narcotráfico, la extorsión y la minería ilegal en tierras protegidas de la Amazonía. Ambas facciones nacieron del mismo proceso de paz que en 2016 desarmó oficialmente a las FARC; quienes rechazaron el acuerdo continuaron operando bajo el mismo nombre pero sin ningún proyecto político, solo la lógica de la economía criminal.

La operación de rescate chocó contra múltiples obstáculos. El clima impidió el acceso en helicóptero. Las tropas terrestres avanzaban con cautela por un terreno que se sospechaba minado. Y los equipos de socorro debían esperar que los propios grupos armados les dieran permiso para entrar —un reconocimiento tácito de quién controlaba realmente el territorio.

El ministro de Defensa describió la situación como 'inconcebible y absurda': grupos cuyo único objetivo era el narcotráfico y la supervivencia criminal. Pero la violencia tenía también un peso político inmediato. A días de las elecciones presidenciales del 31 de mayo, la oposición convirtió los muertos del Guaviare en argumento contra la estrategia de paz negociada del presidente saliente Gustavo Petro, acusándolo de excesiva tolerancia con los grupos que buscaba dialogar. Los cuerpos en el campo se volvieron parte de un debate más viejo y más hondo: si en Colombia la respuesta a la guerra es el diálogo o la fuerza.

Forty-eight rebels lay dead in the Colombian Amazon after days of fighting between two splinter factions of the defunct FARC guerrilla group. The bodies remained where they fell in Guaviare, a remote region six hours by four-wheel drive from the nearest town, waiting for rescue teams who could not yet reach them. The local mayor, Willy Rodríguez of San José del Guaviare, described the scene to international reporters: corpses piled in the field, needing to be evacuated, with no way yet to retrieve them. Videos circulating on social media captured the sound of heavy gunfire from inside homes where civilians had taken shelter, caught between the warring factions.

The clash erupted in the heart of Colombia's worst violence in a decade, arriving just days before the country's May 31 presidential election. Two rival groups—one led by Iván Mordisco, the nation's most wanted criminal, and the other by a commander known as Calarcá—fought to control territory and the lucrative routes for moving cocaine and managing illegal mining operations. These were not abstract territorial disputes. Control of Guaviare meant control of money: the extortion rackets, the drug pipelines, the illegal extraction of minerals from protected lands. The groups also imposed their own brutal order on the civilian population through curfews and movement restrictions, ruling through fear.

Guaviare has long been a stronghold of the FARC. The region's current chaos stems from the 2016 peace agreement that officially ended the organization's armed struggle. Some fighters accepted the deal and disarmed. Others rejected it entirely, splintering into competing criminal enterprises that retained the FARC name and structure but abandoned any pretense of political ideology. Now they fought each other with the same intensity they once directed at the Colombian state.

The rescue operation faced multiple obstacles. The terrain was remote and difficult to access by land. The Colombian military attempted to reach the site by helicopter but weather conditions made flight impossible. Ground troops were advancing slowly toward the location. Beyond the practical challenges lay a more sinister one: the area was believed to be heavily mined, making any approach dangerous. The military and rescue teams waited for the armed groups themselves to grant permission to enter—a grim acknowledgment of who actually controlled the territory.

Defense Minister Pedro Sánchez characterized the violence with frustration bordering on disbelief. The groups had, in his assessment, a single objective: criminal economy, drug trafficking, survival through narcotics. "It is inconceivable, it is absurd," he told reporters. The military had deployed units to the region and was working to establish access, but the remoteness and the armed groups' dominance made progress slow.

The timing of the violence intensified its political weight. Colombia was heading into a presidential election amid a surge in kidnappings, assassinations, and bombings carried out by armed groups. Security had become the dominant concern for voters. Outgoing president Gustavo Petro, the country's first leftist leader, had attempted to negotiate peace agreements with all the armed criminal organizations. The opposition seized on the violence as evidence that his approach had failed, accusing him of being too lenient with the groups he sought to negotiate with. The bodies in Guaviare became part of a larger argument about whether dialogue or force was the answer to Colombia's armed conflict.

The bodies are there piled up, they need to be evacuated
— Willy Rodríguez, mayor of San José del Guaviare
They have a single objective: criminal economy, drug trafficking. It is inconceivable, it is absurd
— Pedro Sánchez, Colombian Defense Minister
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why does it matter that these are FARC dissidents and not just criminal gangs?

Model

Because the FARC was supposed to be finished. The 2016 peace deal was meant to end that chapter. These splinters are what happens when you have an agreement some fighters reject—they keep the name, the structure, the ideology's ghost, but they're really just fighting over drug money now. It's the peace that failed, not just security.

Inventor

The mayor said bodies are piled up and need evacuating. Why can't they just go get them?

Model

The area is remote—six hours from town by truck on rough roads. But more than that, the armed groups control it. The military can't fly in because of weather, can't drive in safely because the land is mined. So rescue teams are literally waiting for permission from the criminals to enter their own territory.

Inventor

What's the connection between this fight and the election happening in days?

Model

Voters are terrified. There's been a wave of violence—kidnappings, murders, bombings. The outgoing president tried to make peace with these groups and it didn't work. Now his opponents are saying he was naive or complicit. This clash is proof, in their eyes, that negotiation doesn't stop the killing.

Inventor

Are these groups still ideological, or purely criminal now?

Model

Purely criminal. They use the FARC name and structure, but ideology is gone. They fight over cocaine routes and illegal mining operations. They impose curfews on civilians not for political reasons but to control territory and extract money. It's organized crime wearing a guerrilla uniform.

Inventor

What happens to the civilians trapped there?

Model

They live under the groups' control. Curfews, movement restrictions, extortion. They're caught between factions that don't care about them except as subjects to tax and control. When the fighting started, they took shelter in their homes and recorded the gunfire. They're witnesses to a war that has nothing to do with them.

Contact Us FAQ