Canadian targeting tech fuels Ukraine's Bayraktar drone strikes against Russia

The drones have successfully destroyed Russian military equipment and systems used in the invasion, contributing to Ukraine's defensive capabilities against Russian forces.
Canada has been quiet about that. I think it's up to Canada whether it wants to be seen as part of that or not.
Ukraine's former ambassador to Canada on whether his country should credit Canadian technology in its defense against Russian invasion.

Ukrainian forces are effectively using Bayraktar TB2 drones equipped with Canadian-made Wescam targeting systems to destroy Russian convoys, tanks, and missile systems. Canada halted Wescam exports to Turkey after diversion to Azerbaijan's war, yet $23 million in optical targeting devices shipped to Ukraine in late 2021 suggest continued supply.

  • L3Harris Wescam, an Ontario company, supplies targeting systems for Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drones used by Ukraine
  • Canada banned Wescam exports to Turkey in 2020-2021 after diversion to Azerbaijan's war
  • $23 million in optical targeting device shipments to Ukraine recorded in November 2021 alone
  • Ukrainian forces have used TB2 drones to destroy Russian convoys, tanks, and surface-to-air missile systems
  • Ukraine and Turkey announced a joint drone manufacturing facility in 2021

Ontario-based L3Harris Wescam's targeting systems in Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drones are helping Ukraine strike Russian military assets. Canada suspended exports to Turkey in 2020-2021 but shipments to Ukraine appear to have continued.

When Ukrainian forces needed to strike back at Russian convoys rolling across their borders in early 2022, they reached for Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 drones—and inside those drones, guiding their weapons toward tanks and missile systems, was Canadian technology.

The targeting system came from L3Harris Wescam, an Ontario company that has supplied the optical sensors and fire-control gear for Bayraktar drones for years. Ukrainian military officials reported success: destroyed Russian convoys, disabled tanks, neutralized surface-to-air missile systems. The drones became so celebrated that Ukrainians wrote a pop song about them, lyrics declaring the machines turned "Russian bandits into ghosts." Andriy Shevchenko, Ukraine's former ambassador to Canada and a reserve officer in the Ukrainian military, spoke from Kyiv about the psychological lift the drones provided. When Ukrainian forces destroyed a Russian Buk missile system—the same type that shot down Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 in 2014—it felt like vindication.

The TB2 represented something new in modern warfare: a relatively inexpensive delivery platform for precision weapons, costing a fraction of what a fighter jet or bomber would demand. Aviation Week's London bureau chief Tony Osborne called it an "extraordinarily effective tool," noting the asymmetry was stark. "You've got this cheap machine that is dropping very small bombs on very expensive tanks, armoured vehicles and surface-to-air missiles," he said. Russian forces, he observed, seemed unprepared for the threat, parking their vehicles in ways that made them vulnerable to drone strikes.

But the Canadian government said nothing. L3Harris, the Florida parent company of Wescam, declined to comment. Neither would acknowledge the role of Canadian-made targeting gear in the Ukrainian strikes. Kelsey Gallagher, a weapons-trade researcher at Project Ploughshares, an arms control watchdog based in Waterloo, Ontario, became certain of the connection by examining the visual evidence itself. The graphical overlay visible in Ukrainian drone-strike footage—the interface operators see when targeting—matched Wescam's proprietary design. He compared it to footage from Turkish military operations in Syria in 2020 and found the same signature. The same interface had appeared in conflicts across Syria, Iraq, and Nagorno-Karabakh. Now it was in Ukraine.

The path the technology took to reach Ukrainian operators remained unclear. Canada had suspended Wescam exports to Turkey in fall 2020 after discovering that TB2 drones equipped with Canadian sensors had been diverted to Azerbaijan during its war with Armenia. By spring 2021, Canada cancelled all export permits for Wescam gear destined for Turkey, a decision that angered Ankara. Yet the technology kept flowing. Statistics Canada's export data, analyzed by Project Ploughshares, showed $23 million in shipments under an optical-devices category in November 2021—the same classification used when targeting gear had been shipped to Turkey. There were additional spikes of roughly $8 million each in June and December 2021. A single Wescam MX-15D targeting system costs approximately $1 million. The shipments dwarfed Canada's typical military exports to Ukraine; in 2020, Canada had shipped less than $360,000 in military equipment to the country.

Ukraine had begun acquiring TB2 drones several years earlier and announced in 2021 a partnership with Turkey to manufacture them domestically. Turkish drone maker Baykar had explored replacing Wescam sensors with Turkish alternatives for some export markets, but Gallagher found no evidence of widespread adoption of substitutes. Wescam remained the preferred optical sensor among TB2 operators worldwide. The Canadian government's export ban on Turkey did not prevent direct shipments to Ukraine, a legal distinction that appeared to matter.

Shevchenko, the Ukrainian diplomat, said the question of Canada's role was ultimately one for Canada to answer. "I have never seen Canada or Canadians advertising this here," he said. "I think it would be up to Canada if it wants to be seen as part of this." The technology was working. The drones were effective. But Canada remained publicly silent about whether it wanted credit for helping Ukraine defend itself.

You've got this cheap machine that is dropping very small bombs on very expensive tanks, armoured vehicles and surface-to-air missiles.
— Tony Osborne, Aviation Week
Footage released of air strikes carried out by Ukrainian Bayraktar TB2s include the graphical interface associated with Wescam surveillance and targeting sensors. This is Canadian hardware.
— Kelsey Gallagher, Project Ploughshares
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why does Canada's silence matter here? The technology is doing what it's supposed to do—helping Ukraine survive.

Model

Because silence is a choice. When you ban exports to Turkey for diversion to Azerbaijan, you're making a moral statement. When you then ship the same technology to Ukraine under a different legal category, you're making another statement. The question is whether you're willing to own it.

Inventor

So this is about accountability?

Model

It's about honesty. Shevchenko is saying: if this Canadian gear is helping us, Canada should say so. Not for credit, necessarily, but because it matters what you stand for. Right now, Canada looks like it's helping while pretending it isn't.

Inventor

Could there be a reason for the silence? Diplomatic sensitivity with Turkey?

Model

Possibly. Turkey is NATO. But that's exactly why the choice to speak or stay quiet becomes significant. You're either willing to defend your own technology's role in Ukraine's survival, or you're not.

Inventor

And the $23 million in exports—is that definitely Wescam gear?

Model

The researchers are confident based on the export category and the timing, but it's not officially confirmed. That's part of the problem. We're reading export statistics and analyzing drone footage because the government won't say what it's actually doing.

Inventor

What happens next?

Model

Ukraine keeps using the drones. Turkey and Ukraine deepen their manufacturing partnership. And Canada continues to not talk about it.

Contáctanos FAQ