Brazil's stock market hits year-low as fiscal uncertainty weighs on investors

The market had been hoping for clarity; what it got instead was another round of political haggling.
The precatories amendment passed the Chamber but left investors unsettled rather than reassured due to narrow margins and required Senate approval.

Ibovespa dropped 2.09% to 103,412 points, its worst close of 2021, driven by losses in banks, Vale, and Petrobras amid fiscal concerns. The precatories PEC approval in the Chamber created uncertainty rather than confidence due to narrow margins and required Senate approval, pressuring long-term interest rates.

  • Ibovespa fell 2.09% to 103,412 points, its worst close of 2021
  • Real weakened to 5.60 per dollar, up 0.28%
  • Itaú reported 34.77% profit growth but shares fell 5.28%
  • Cielo's net profit surged 111% to 211.9 million reais
  • Federal Reserve began tapering stimulus by 15 billion dollars this month

Brazil's Ibovespa stock index fell 2.09% to its lowest point of 2021 amid uncertainty over the precatories constitutional amendment and deteriorating macroeconomic conditions, while the dollar rose to R$ 5.60.

Rio de Janeiro's stock market closed Thursday at its lowest point all year, a sharp reversal from the gains being posted simultaneously in New York and London. The Ibovespa fell 2.09 percent to 103,412 points, dragged down by heavy selling in the country's largest companies—the major banks, Vale, and Petrobras—while the real weakened against the dollar, which closed at 5.60 reais, up 0.28 percent on the day.

The immediate culprit was fiscal uncertainty. Earlier in the week, Brazil's Chamber of Deputies had approved a constitutional amendment known as the PEC dos Precatórios, a measure designed to create budgetary room for emergency aid and to adjust the spending ceiling rules. But the vote's narrow margin and the requirement for Senate approval afterward left investors unsettled rather than reassured. The market had been hoping for clarity; what it got instead was another round of political haggling. Gustavo Cruz, a strategist at RB Investimentos, put it plainly: the market was reacting to a sense that fiscal discipline had been abandoned, that nothing positive was being worked on. This perception rippled through the economy. When investors lose confidence in a government's willingness to manage its finances, the central bank's ability to control inflation weakens, forcing interest rates higher. The longer-dated interest rate contracts reflected this anxiety. The contract for January 2025 rose from 12.04 percent to 12.15 percent, and the one for January 2027 climbed to 12.17 percent.

Within the market, the damage was uneven. Petrobras ordinary shares fell 2.95 percent and preferred shares dropped 3.17 percent, pressured both by the broader selloff and by falling oil prices abroad. Vale lost 1.14 percent. The Grupo Pão de Açúcar, Brazil's largest retailer, fell 7.70 percent after reporting a loss of 89 million reais attributable to controlling shareholders in the third quarter, despite sales revenue of 12.08 billion reais. The major banks took the heaviest blows. Itaú's preferred shares fell 5.28 percent and Bradesco's fell 6.62 percent—a particularly bitter pill for Itaú, which had just announced strong earnings. The bank reported recurring net profit of 6.779 billion reais in the third quarter, up 34.77 percent year-over-year, with robust growth in credit and solid asset quality in retail. Yet none of this mattered to the market. Investors were fleeing on macroeconomic principle, and the banks, as large-cap stocks and traditional exit routes from the market, bore the brunt.

There were exceptions. The meatpacking sector rose as a bloc. Marfrig, Minerva, and JBS all gained between 3 and 3.7 percent, buoyed by strong international demand. The sector has become a defensive play for investors who want to stay in equities but fear broader economic deterioration. Cielo, the payments processor, rose 1.29 percent after reporting a 111 percent surge in net profit to 211.9 million reais in the third quarter, driven by higher credit and debit card transaction volumes that reached 179.8 billion reais.

Globally, the day's other major event was the Federal Reserve's announcement that it would begin tapering its asset purchases this month, starting with 15 billion dollars and accelerating in December. The Fed kept its benchmark rate unchanged at zero to 0.25 percent and signaled that the end of stimulus did not necessarily mean the start of rate hikes. Fed Chair Jerome Powell worked to separate the two narratives. Had he signaled imminent rate increases, markets worldwide would have fallen much harder. As it was, the announcement had already been priced in by traders, so the reaction was muted. The S&P 500 rose 0.42 percent and the Nasdaq climbed 0.81 percent. European markets also gained—London up 0.43 percent, Frankfurt up 0.44 percent, Paris up 0.53 percent. Asian markets followed suit, with Tokyo's Nikkei rising 0.93 percent and Hong Kong and Shanghai each up about 0.8 percent.

Brazil stood alone. While the rest of the world absorbed the Fed's news with relative calm, Brazil's investors were fixated on their own government's inability or unwillingness to put its fiscal house in order. The precatories amendment would move to the Senate, where its fate remained uncertain. In the meantime, the market had rendered its verdict: uncertainty about the future of Brazil's public finances was a more pressing concern than anything happening in Washington.

The market was reacting to a sense that fiscal discipline had been abandoned, that nothing positive was being worked on.
— Gustavo Cruz, strategist at RB Investimentos
This approval resolves the short term for emergency aid, but pushes fiscal risk into the future and will remain a source of concern.
— Pedro Galdi, analyst at Mirae Asset
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why did the market fall so sharply when the precatories amendment actually passed the Chamber?

Model

Because passage wasn't the same as resolution. The vote was narrow, and the Senate still had to approve it. Investors wanted certainty, not another round of political theater.

Inventor

But didn't the amendment solve the immediate problem—the emergency aid funding?

Model

In the short term, yes. But it pushed the fiscal risk into the future. Analysts saw it as a band-aid on a deeper wound. The market was asking: if the government can't manage its spending ceiling now, what happens next year?

Inventor

The banks fell even though Itaú had excellent earnings. How does that happen?

Model

Because individual company performance doesn't matter when investors are fleeing the entire market on macroeconomic fear. Banks are the exit door—everyone sells them first when they want out. Itaú's strong results were drowned out by the broader panic.

Inventor

So the Federal Reserve's tapering announcement didn't hurt Brazil?

Model

It was already expected, so it didn't shock anyone. But it highlighted the contrast: the U.S. market could absorb the news calmly because investors trust American institutions. Brazil couldn't, because trust in fiscal management was already gone.

Inventor

Why did meatpacking stocks rise while everything else fell?

Model

They're a hedge. When you're scared about the economy but don't want to leave the market entirely, you move into defensive sectors with strong international demand. Meatpacking has that—it sells to the world regardless of what happens in Brasília.

Inventor

What happens next?

Model

The Senate votes. If it passes, there's temporary relief. If it fails, the market will fall further. Either way, the underlying problem—a government that can't control spending—remains unsolved.

Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en O GLOBO ↗
Contáctanos FAQ