Trump lifts Russia oil sanctions as Israel launches new Iran strikes

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei killed in previous Israeli-US strikes; ongoing attacks endanger civilian populations in Lebanon and Iran.
Unlimited ammunition and firepower, and plenty of time ahead
Trump's statement on his capacity to wage war against Iran, signaling an open-ended military commitment.

In the long and turbulent history of the Middle East, another chapter of fire and consequence is being written. Israeli forces have struck Tehran's infrastructure in a sustained campaign that began with the killing of Iran's Supreme Leader, while the United States — caught between military escalation and economic fragility — has quietly lifted sanctions on Russian oil to keep global markets from unraveling. The world watches as two logics collide: the logic of force, which seeks security through destruction, and the logic of markets, which demands stability at almost any price.

  • Israeli strikes on Tehran resumed Friday morning, audible across the capital, continuing a campaign that has already claimed the life of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
  • Oil prices surging past $100 per barrel have forced Washington into a counterintuitive move — temporarily lifting sanctions on Russian petroleum to flood markets and prevent a global economic spiral.
  • President Trump's Truth Social declaration of 'unlimited ammunition and firepower' signals this is no limited operation, but an openly stated campaign of sustained military pressure against Iran's leadership.
  • The destruction of the Zrarieh bridge over the Litani River cuts a key Hezbollah supply corridor, deepening Lebanon's fragility and widening the theater of conflict beyond Iran's borders.
  • The Treasury's sanctions exemption expires April 11, leaving a narrow window for diplomacy to outpace escalation before markets and military momentum both spiral beyond control.

The Middle East is burning again, and the world's oil markets are bracing for the shock. Israeli forces launched a fresh wave of large-scale strikes against Tehran's infrastructure on Friday morning, the latest escalation in a campaign that began on February 28 when Israel and the United States jointly struck Iran — killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the process. With crude prices climbing above $100 per barrel, the Trump administration moved to prevent economic crisis through an unlikely measure: lifting sanctions on Russian oil.

The U.S. Treasury announced it would temporarily authorize countries to purchase Russian petroleum currently in transit, a move Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent estimated could release hundreds of millions of barrels into global markets. The exemption runs only until April 11 — a narrow window designed to suppress prices without signaling any permanent softening toward Moscow.

On the ground, Israeli forces also claimed the destruction of the Zrarieh bridge over the Litani River in southern Lebanon, severing what the military described as a critical Hezbollah crossing point. Israel argued the bridge had been used to position rocket launchers and consolidate militant movement between the country's north and south.

President Trump left little ambiguity about his intentions, posting on Truth Social that he possessed 'unlimited ammunition and firepower' and framing the campaign as a historic reckoning with Iranian leadership. The rhetoric underscored that this was not a contained response but the opening of a sustained offensive.

The convergence of Israeli strikes, American sanctions relief for Russian oil, and Trump's declarations painted a portrait of a region in free fall. Iran had already retaliated against American targets in the Persian Gulf following the February strikes, and further cycles of retaliation appeared inevitable. Meanwhile, Ukraine's war entered its fifth year with no resolution in sight, and the world found itself managing multiple overlapping conflicts simultaneously. The question hanging over all of it was whether a temporary injection of Russian crude could buy enough time for diplomacy — or whether the escalation had already moved beyond the reach of any market intervention.

The Middle East is burning again, and the world's oil markets are bracing for the shock. On Friday morning, Israeli forces launched a fresh wave of large-scale attacks against Tehran's infrastructure, with explosions audible across the Iranian capital as the military announced the strikes at 9 a.m. local time. The assault came as part of an escalating campaign that began nearly two weeks earlier, on February 28, when Israel and the United States jointly struck Iran, killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the process. Now, with the region destabilized and crude prices spiking above $100 per barrel, the Trump administration moved to prevent an economic crisis by doing something counterintuitive: it lifted sanctions on Russian oil.

In a statement released Thursday, the U.S. Treasury Department announced it would temporarily authorize countries to purchase Russian petroleum currently in transit, a measure designed to flood global markets with crude and suppress prices. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent estimated that hundreds of millions of barrels could enter the market if the restrictions were removed. The exemption would remain in effect only until April 11, a narrow window meant to address the immediate price surge without signaling a permanent shift in policy toward Moscow. The timing was deliberate—oil had been climbing steadily as traders priced in the risk of wider Middle Eastern conflict, and the administration wanted to prevent that upward spiral from destabilizing economies worldwide.

On the ground in the region, the military campaign continued with surgical precision. Israeli forces claimed they destroyed the Zrarieh bridge spanning the Litani River in southern Lebanon, which they described as a critical crossing point for Hezbollah fighters moving between the north and south of the country. In a military statement, Israel argued the bridge had become essential infrastructure for the militant group to consolidate power and prepare for combat, and that Hezbollah had recently positioned rocket launchers nearby and fired from the location toward Israeli territory. The destruction of the bridge, the military said, was necessary both to protect Israeli civilians and to prevent further harm to Lebanese civilians caught in the crossfire.

President Trump, meanwhile, made his position unmistakable. In a post on his Truth Social platform, he declared he possessed "unlimited ammunition and firepower" and "plenty of time" to wage war against what he called the "demented scum" leading Iran. "Look what happens to this demented scum today," he wrote. "They've spent 47 years killing innocent people around the world, and now I, as the 47th president of the United States, am killing them. What an honor it is to do so!" The language was unambiguous—this was not a limited response but the opening of a sustained campaign.

The convergence of these events—Israeli strikes, American sanctions relief for Russian oil, and Trump's bellicose rhetoric—painted a picture of a region in free fall. Iran had already responded to the February strikes by attacking American military bases and targets in the Persian Gulf, and with the new Israeli assault on Tehran, the cycle of retaliation seemed certain to continue. Lebanon, already fragile, faced the prospect of deeper involvement as Hezbollah absorbed the loss of key infrastructure. And globally, the energy markets remained volatile, dependent on whether the Treasury's gambit of releasing Russian oil would actually stabilize prices or whether further escalation would overwhelm that supply injection.

The broader context made the moment even more precarious. Ukraine's war had now stretched into its fifth year, with no peace settlement in sight despite Trump's stated interest in negotiation. Pakistan and Afghanistan remained locked in their own tensions. The world was managing multiple overlapping conflicts, and the Middle East was no longer simmering—it was boiling. The question now was whether the temporary oil exemption would buy enough time for diplomacy to work, or whether the region would continue its descent into a wider war that no amount of crude on the market could offset.

They've spent 47 years killing innocent people around the world, and now I, as the 47th president, am killing them. What an honor it is to do so.
— President Donald Trump, on Truth Social
The bridge served as a crossing between northern and southern Lebanon for Hezbollah to strengthen its power and prepare for combat, endangering Lebanese civilians.
— Israeli military statement
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why would Trump lift sanctions on Russian oil at the exact moment Israel is escalating strikes on Iran? Doesn't that seem contradictory?

Model

Not if you separate the military and economic games. Trump is prosecuting the war against Iran while simultaneously trying to prevent that war from breaking the global economy. Hundreds of millions of barrels flooding the market could keep prices from spiking past $120 or $130, which would hurt American consumers and allies.

Inventor

But he's helping Russia, isn't he? Doesn't that undermine his own stated position on Moscow?

Model

Tactically, yes. But the Treasury framed it as temporary—just until April 11. It's a pressure valve, not a policy reversal. The real question is whether it works. If oil stays manageable, Trump looks like he solved the problem. If prices keep climbing anyway, he's just given Russia a gift for nothing.

Inventor

What about the civilians in Lebanon and Iran? The bridge destruction, the strikes on Tehran—how many people are we talking about?

Model

The sources don't give casualty figures, which is telling in itself. Israel claims the bridge was a military target and that destroying it protects Lebanese civilians. But a bridge is infrastructure. When you cut off a region's ability to move goods and people, civilians suffer whether or not bombs hit them directly.

Inventor

Trump's language was pretty extreme. "Demented scum," "killing them." Is that just rhetoric or does it signal something about how far he's willing to go?

Model

It signals he's not interested in off-ramps. When a president talks like that publicly, he's telling his military and his allies there are no limits. It's a green light. Whether it's just talk or whether it shapes actual decisions—that's what we'll find out in the coming weeks.

Want the full story? Read the original at AS ↗
Contact Us FAQ