Astronauts Print Human Organs in Space to Overcome Gravity's Collapse

Millions of people worldwide await organ transplants; approximately 1 million need kidney transplants alone, with only 10% of global demand met annually.
If I can create a lung for my daughter while she is alive, I will be very happy.
Ken Church, CEO of NScrypt, speaks from the particular urgency of the personal about why his company pursues bioprinting technology.

Astronaut Andrew Morgan printed cardiac tissues in space using bioink, demonstrating that microgravity prevents tissue collapse that occurs under Earth's gravity conditions. Multiple biotech companies have successfully printed basic tissues and mini-organs; full-scale complex organs like kidneys and livers remain 10-15 years away from human transplantation.

  • Andrew Morgan spent 272 days on the ISS in 2020, printing cardiac tissue using biotink in microgravity
  • Approximately 1 million people worldwide await kidney transplants; only 10% of global organ transplant demand is met annually
  • Itedale Redwan estimates 10-15 years until fully functional printed organs are ready for human transplantation
  • The Biofabrication Unit aboard the ISS cost $7 million and was developed by Techshot and NScrypt

NASA astronauts conduct 3D bioprinting experiments aboard the ISS to develop functional human organs for transplant, leveraging microgravity to overcome structural collapse challenges faced on Earth.

Andrew Morgan, a physician and NASA astronaut, spent 272 days aboard the International Space Station in 2020, but his most consequential work happened in the microgravity laboratory orbiting 400 kilometers above Earth. There, he printed human heart tissue, cell by cell, using a 3D printer loaded with biotink—a biological ink designed to build living structures. The experiment was not science fiction. It was a deliberate test of whether the weightless environment of space could solve a problem that has plagued bioprinting on Earth: gravity itself.

Morgan's path to the ISS began in the field hospitals of Iraq and Afghanistan. As a frontline Army physician, he treated soldiers whose bodies had been torn apart by explosions—young men who lost limbs, who suffered catastrophic injuries that no surgeon could fully repair. Watching them heal slowly, incompletely, Morgan began to wonder: what if damaged tissue could simply be printed anew, using the patient's own cells? The possibility haunted him. If a wounded soldier could receive a new organ grown from his own biology, rejection would become nearly impossible. The body would recognize the transplant as itself.

The obstacle was gravity. When researchers tried to print tissue on Earth using a 3D bioprinter, the structure would collapse under its own weight as it formed. The cells needed support—a temporary biological scaffold—to hold them in place while they organized into functional tissue. This was especially true for hollow structures like the chambers of the heart. But in microgravity, that problem vanished. The tissue could form without support, layer upon layer, building complexity in the absence of downward force.

The Biofabrication Unit that Morgan used aboard the ISS had been launched in 2019 and upgraded by 2021. Developed by American companies Techshot and NScrypt, it was designed to print human cells into organ-like tissues. Morgan began with cardiac tissue of increasing thickness, but the team's ambition extended far beyond the heart. They wanted to print whole organs—kidneys, livers, lungs—that could be transplanted into patients waiting on lists that stretched across the world.

The scale of that need is staggering. Approximately one million people globally await kidney transplants alone. The World Health Organization estimates that only 130,000 organ transplants occur annually worldwide, meeting just 10 percent of demand. In the United States, 107,000 patients sit on transplant waiting lists. For those who do receive an organ from a donor, the price is a lifetime of immunosuppressant drugs to prevent their own immune system from rejecting the foreign tissue. A printed organ made from a patient's own cells would eliminate that burden.

Biotech companies around the world are racing toward this goal using different approaches. Most reprogramme a patient's cells using a Nobel Prize-winning technique developed a decade ago, converting them into stem cells—cells theoretically capable of becoming any tissue in the human body. With the right nutrients and signals, these stem cells can be coaxed into becoming the desired cell type, then suspended in hydrogel and printed layer by layer into functional living tissue. Itedale Redwan, the scientific lead at Cellink, the first company to commercialize biotink, estimates that fully functional printed organs suitable for human transplantation remain 10 to 15 years away. But the groundwork is accelerating. In 2018, researchers at Newcastle University printed the first human cornea. A team at Tel Aviv University produced a miniature heart from a cardiac patient's own cells. Scientists at Michigan State University printed a miniature human heart using a stem cell framework that mimicked fetal development, allowing them to create all the cell types and complex structures a beating heart requires.

Yet the heart, for all its symbolic weight, is relatively simple—chambers surrounded by muscle. The real challenge lies ahead: kidneys and livers are vastly more complex, composed of many cell types interwoven with networks of blood vessels and nerves. Jennifer Lewis, a bioengineering professor at Harvard, has spent years experimenting with tissue printing. She speaks candidly about what remains unknown: how to recreate the complete function of an organ, the synchronized beating of the heart, the filtering capacity of the kidney. "The function of tissue is often not as mature when created in the laboratory compared to living tissue," she says. "It may be easy in science fiction, but for us it is a dream. Still, we can already see the paths for this to become reality in the next two decades."

The cost of printing organs in space is prohibitive—the Biofabrication Unit alone cost seven million dollars, with additional expenses for launching materials and returning printed tissues safely to Earth. This has spurred research into whether microgravity conditions can be replicated on the ground. A Russian medical company, 3D Bioprinting Solutions, has developed a system using magnetic fields to levitate tissue as it forms. But even as scientists work to bring the technology home, some envision a different future: bioprinters installed in low Earth orbit, continuously producing increasingly complex human tissues in the weightless environment, eventually sustaining human missions to the Moon and Mars, where organ donors will be impossibly scarce and food production will demand the same cellular engineering.

Yet the prospect of printed organs raises questions that extend far beyond medicine. Steve Morris, chief executive of BioLife4D, has received emails calling his company "incarnate demons" for pursuing life extension. Others ask darker questions: If a parent could print a larger, more efficient heart for a twelve-year-old athlete, why not? If evolution gave us one set of heart valves, should we print two? Ken Church, CEO of NScrypt, speaks from the particular urgency of the personal: his daughter was born with only one lung. She is twenty-seven now and healthy, but still breathing with half a lung. "If I can create a lung for my daughter while she is alive, I will be very happy," he says. His company is developing the next generation of bioprinters, using centrifugation and oxygen infusion instead of microgravity to prevent tissue death at the core. The line between saving a life and enhancing it, between medicine and something else entirely, will define the decades ahead.

When you create a tissue culture with a 3D printer on Earth's surface, the culture tends to collapse under gravity. But you don't suffer those effects in microgravity environments, and that's why these experiments are so important.
— Andrew Morgan, NASA astronaut
The function of tissue is often not as mature when created in the laboratory compared to living tissue. It may be easy in science fiction, but for us it is a dream. Still, we can already see the paths for this to become reality in the next two decades.
— Jennifer Lewis, bioengineering professor at Harvard
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why does gravity matter so much for printing organs? Can't you just print them carefully on Earth?

Model

Gravity pulls down on the tissue as it's being built. Imagine stacking wet clay without a mold—it collapses under its own weight. In space, there's no down. The cells can organize freely, layer by layer, without that constant pressure trying to crush them.

Inventor

So Andrew Morgan was essentially testing whether the problem was solvable, not whether it was already solved.

Model

Exactly. He was proving the concept works. The real work—making it practical, making it affordable, making it safe for human transplant—that's still ahead. Ten to fifteen years, maybe more.

Inventor

The ethical questions seem as big as the medical ones. If you can print a better organ, who gets it?

Model

That's the question nobody wants to answer yet. Right now, the framing is survival—you need a kidney or you die. But once printing becomes routine, the conversation shifts. Enhancement. Inequality. What counts as medicine and what counts as something else.

Inventor

Ken Church's daughter—she's the reason his company exists, isn't it?

Model

Yes. That's what drives a lot of this work. It's not abstract. It's personal. A father who watched his daughter struggle to breathe with one lung, wondering if he could print her a second one. That's the real engine here.

Inventor

And if it works, if they perfect it—what then?

Model

Then we have to decide who we want to become. That's the harder problem than the printing itself.

Fale Conosco FAQ