It is normal that the two principal economies experience tensions
Trump expressed optimism about the meeting while acknowledging Xi as a tough negotiator; China framed occasional friction as normal between major economies. A preliminary trade agreement was reached in Malaysia on Sunday, with current tariffs at 30% on Chinese goods and 10% on US goods, down from peaks of 145% and 125%.
- Trump and Xi met Thursday morning at Gimhae Air Base in Busan, South Korea
- Current US tariffs on Chinese goods: 30%; Chinese tariffs on US goods: 10%
- Preliminary agreement reached in Malaysia on Sunday during fifth round of negotiations since April
- Existing tariff truce expires in November
- TikTok's future in the US is also on the negotiating table
US President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping have begun their first summit since Trump's return to power in Busan, South Korea, seeking to resolve commercial disputes between the world's two largest economies.
Donald Trump and Xi Jinping sat down Thursday morning at Gimhae Air Base in the port city of Busan, South Korea, for what would be their first face-to-face meeting since the American president returned to office. The encounter began just after 11 a.m. local time, with both leaders arriving within minutes of each other—Trump by helicopter from nearby Gyeongju, where he had been attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, and Xi by Air China direct from Beijing. They came to the table with a single, urgent objective: to find a way forward on the trade war that has roiled the world's two largest economies for months.
The mood, at least in the opening moments, tilted toward cautious optimism. Trump told reporters he expected "a good meeting," though he did not shy away from acknowledging that Xi was "a tough negotiator." The Chinese president, for his part, framed the friction between the two nations as something inevitable. "It is normal that the two principal economies of the world experience tensions from time to time," he said as the summit began. The language was measured, almost diplomatic—a stark contrast to the escalating rhetoric that had defined much of the preceding months.
What brought them to the table was a preliminary agreement hammered out just four days earlier in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, during the fifth round of trade negotiations since April. The details remained opaque, but the signal was clear: both sides had found enough common ground to pause the bleeding. The current tariff regime told the story of how far the conflict had spiraled. The United States was now imposing a 30 percent tax on Chinese goods, while China had responded with a 10 percent levy on American products. These numbers, steep as they were, represented a dramatic retreat from the peaks reached when Trump first unleashed the tariff offensive in April—145 percent and 125 percent, respectively. The damage had been real and visible across both economies.
What remained to be negotiated was whether this temporary truce could become permanent. The existing tariff agreement was set to expire in November, and both leaders knew that allowing it to lapse would mean a return to the brink. Trump had already signaled his willingness to move in a different direction. He said he expected to "lower" the tariffs on Chinese goods, framing the reduction not merely as an economic concession but as a tool to address what he saw as a separate crisis: the fentanyl epidemic ravaging American communities. The connection was deliberate—a way of tying trade policy to a domestic emergency that resonated across the political spectrum.
There was another prize on the table as well: the future of TikTok in the United States. American law required the social media platform to sever its ties to its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, or face a ban. The national security rationale was familiar—concerns about data flows and foreign influence. But the app had become so woven into American life, particularly among younger users, that any permanent ban would be politically costly. A trade deal that resolved the TikTok question could be a win for both sides, giving Trump something to claim as a victory while allowing China to preserve a valuable asset.
The financial markets were watching closely. When trading opened in Shanghai and Shenzhen on Thursday morning, the response was muted and mixed. The Shanghai Composite Index dipped 0.14 percent, though it remained near the decade-high it had reached the day before. Shenzhen fell 0.51 percent. The CSI 300, which tracks the three hundred largest stocks across both exchanges, slipped 0.11 percent. The caution in the numbers reflected the uncertainty: investors wanted to believe in a deal, but they had seen optimism fade before. What happened in the next hours would determine whether this summit marked a genuine turning point or simply another temporary pause in a conflict that remained fundamentally unresolved.
Citações Notáveis
We will have a good meeting, though he is a tough negotiator— Donald Trump
It is normal that the two principal economies of the world experience tensions from time to time— Xi Jinping
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Why did they choose South Korea for this meeting instead of meeting in Washington or Beijing?
It's neutral ground. Neither side wanted to appear to be conceding by traveling to the other's capital. South Korea, as a close ally of the US and a major trading partner with China, offered a place where both could meet as equals without the symbolism of one visiting the other's home.
Trump mentioned fentanyl in connection with tariffs. How does that actually work?
It's a political framing device. Trump is saying that if China helps address the fentanyl crisis—which flows largely through Chinese precursor chemicals—he'll be willing to lower tariffs. It ties a domestic crisis to trade leverage, making tariff cuts look like they're solving a real problem rather than just giving ground.
The tariffs have already fallen from 145 percent to 30 percent. Why would they need to fall further?
Because even 30 percent is disruptive to supply chains and raises costs for American consumers and businesses. Both sides want to get back to something closer to normal trade. The question is whether they can agree on terms—on what China has to do in return.
What's the TikTok angle really about?
It's leverage for both sides. For Trump, banning TikTok is popular with his base but economically messy. For China, losing TikTok would be a genuine loss. If they can trade tariff relief for TikTok staying in the US, both leaders can claim victory at home.
The stock markets barely moved. Does that mean investors don't believe in the deal?
It means they're skeptical but hopeful. The markets have seen these negotiations stall before. They're waiting to see if this preliminary agreement actually holds, if the tariff truce gets extended past November, if there's real substance behind the optimism.