The court affirmed that the law applies equally to same-sex relationships
In May 2026, Brazilian actress Alanis Guillen sought refuge in the law after her intimate relationship became a source of fear — obtaining a protective order under the Maria da Penha Law against her ex-girlfriend Giovanna Reis. The case, rooted in documented harassment, threats, and violations of privacy, quietly expanded the legal horizon: a Brazilian court affirmed that protections against intimate partner violence belong equally to those in same-sex relationships. It is a reminder that the architecture of justice, when tested, can be made to shelter more than those who first built it imagined.
- Following their breakup, Guillen documented a persistent pattern of pursuit, threatening messages, and invasions of her privacy that made ordinary life feel unsafe.
- The public visibility of Guillen's career as a Globo television actress amplified scrutiny of the case, drawing coverage across entertainment and legal media in Brazil.
- Judicial intervention came through the Maria da Penha Law — legislation historically applied to heterosexual domestic violence — now invoked to protect a woman from another woman.
- The court issued concrete prohibitions: Reis is barred from approaching, contacting, or threatening Guillen in any form.
- The ruling lands as a legal precedent, signaling that Brazilian courts recognize intimate partner violence within LGBTQ+ relationships as fully within the law's protective scope.
In May 2026, Alanis Guillen — known to Brazilian audiences through the Globo series "Três Graças" — obtained a protective order against her ex-girlfriend Giovanna Reis under the Maria da Penha Law, Brazil's landmark domestic violence statute. The relationship had ended amid public controversy, but what followed the breakup proved more troubling: a documented pattern of harassment, threatening communications, and violations of Guillen's privacy that ultimately required judicial intervention.
The court determined that legal safeguards were necessary and issued an order barring Reis from approaching Guillen, contacting her by any means, or engaging in any form of intimidation. The terms were unambiguous, and the legal mechanism well-established — though its application here carried unusual significance.
The Maria da Penha Law takes its name from a Brazilian survivor of domestic violence and has long been associated with protections in heterosexual relationships. By granting this order in a case involving two women, the court extended the law's reach into same-sex partnerships — affirming that LGBTQ+ individuals experiencing intimate partner violence are equally entitled to its protections. The decision drew wide media attention, partly because of Guillen's public profile, but its implications reach far beyond celebrity: it clarifies, for future victims and future courts, that the law's shelter is not conditional on the gender of those within a relationship.
Alanis Guillen, an actress known for her role in the Globo series "Três Graças," obtained a protective order in May 2026 under Brazil's Maria da Penha Law—legislation designed to protect victims of domestic violence. The order was issued against her ex-girlfriend, Giovanna Reis, following a relationship that had ended amid public controversy.
The protective measure came after Guillen reported a pattern of harassment that extended beyond the breakup itself. She documented instances of persistent pursuit, threatening communications, and violations of her privacy. The specifics of these incidents prompted judicial intervention, with the court determining that legal safeguards were necessary to ensure her safety and security.
The Maria da Penha Law, named after a Brazilian domestic violence survivor, has historically been applied to heterosexual relationships. Its application in Guillen's case—involving two women—represents a significant expansion of how Brazilian courts interpret and enforce the statute. The protective order carries specific prohibitions: Reis is barred from approaching Guillen, making contact through any means, and issuing threats or engaging in any form of intimidation.
The case drew attention across Brazilian media outlets, with coverage spanning entertainment and legal news platforms. The public nature of Guillen's profile as a television actress meant the proceedings received wider scrutiny than many domestic violence cases. Yet the underlying substance remained consistent with countless other applications of the law: one person seeking legal protection from another with whom they had shared an intimate relationship.
What distinguishes this case is its visibility and its legal precedent. By granting the protective order, the court affirmed that the Maria da Penha Law applies equally to same-sex relationships, extending its protections to LGBTQ+ individuals experiencing intimate partner violence. The decision signals that Brazilian jurisprudence recognizes abuse and harassment within same-sex partnerships as falling squarely within the law's scope—a clarification that matters for future cases and for victims seeking recourse through the legal system.
Citas Notables
The protective order carries specific prohibitions: Reis is barred from approaching Guillen, making contact through any means, and issuing threats or engaging in any form of intimidation.— Court order terms
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Why does it matter that this protective order was issued under the Maria da Penha Law specifically, rather than some other legal mechanism?
Because the Maria da Penha Law carries real teeth. It's not just a restraining order—it's a framework built specifically for intimate partner violence, with established procedures and enforcement mechanisms. Using it here signals the court's recognition that what happened between Guillen and Reis falls within that category.
But the law was written for heterosexual relationships, wasn't it?
Yes. That's what makes this significant. Courts have been gradually expanding its application, but each case that goes through the system—especially one involving a public figure—clarifies the law's reach. It says to other LGBTQ+ people: this protection exists for you too.
What does the protective order actually do? Is it just words on paper?
No. It creates legal obligations with real consequences. Reis cannot contact Guillen by any means. She cannot approach her. If she violates it, she faces criminal charges. That's enforcement with teeth.
How does a relationship that ends in public controversy lead to a protective order?
The controversy is separate from the harassment. The relationship ended, and then—according to Guillen's account—the harassment began. Persistent contact, threats, privacy violations. That's when she went to court.
What happens now?
Reis must comply with the order's terms. If she doesn't, Guillen can return to court. The order itself is a legal boundary, and crossing it has consequences.