ABC secretly hunted for news director replacement without Stevens' knowledge

Justin Stevens, a 19-year ABC News veteran, was forced to resign after being replaced without prior knowledge of the search process.
We couldn't get agreement on the way forward
Marks explained why he secretly searched for Stevens' replacement without the news director's knowledge.

At Australia's national broadcaster, a nineteen-year veteran of the newsroom has been quietly replaced — not through confrontation, but through a covert recruitment process he knew nothing about. ABC managing director Hugh Marks, unable to reach agreement with news director Justin Stevens on the future shape of ABC News, hired a search firm in secret and presented Stevens with a fait accompli: a Reuters executive named Simon Robinson would be taking his role. The episode is less a story of one man's departure than a signal of how swiftly institutional transformation can arrive — not announced, but already decided.

  • A nineteen-year ABC News veteran was forced to resign after discovering, without warning, that his replacement had already been hired from Reuters.
  • The secret recruitment process — conducted without Stevens' knowledge — has exposed a deep rift over the future direction of ABC News and how its resources are allocated.
  • Marks is now signalling that no leadership role at the ABC is safe, with a sweeping organisational review underway and legacy programming potentially on the chopping block.
  • A separate controversy over the hiring of Grace Tame for an ABC podcast has added further turbulence, drawing accusations of poor judgment and a public apology from a prominent critic who admitted he had been 'ambushed by a known provocateur.'
  • Marks is attempting to frame all of this — the secret search, the structural cuts, the editorial controversies — as necessary, forward-looking transformation rather than institutional disorder.

Hugh Marks, managing director of Australia's ABC, confirmed this week that he had quietly engaged a recruitment firm to replace news director Justin Stevens — without Stevens knowing any search was underway. The two had reached an impasse over the future of ABC News, and Marks concluded he had no choice but to look elsewhere. Stevens learned of his replacement only when Marks told him directly: Simon Robinson, a Reuters executive, had been hired to take over. Stevens resigned shortly after.

Speaking on Radio National Breakfast with presenter Sally Sara, Marks framed the covert search as a practical necessity, describing it as part of the ABC's routine succession planning. But he also used the interview to signal something larger: every leadership role at the broadcaster was now under review, and structural change was coming. Resources, he said, were stretched too thin across live news, and some long-running legacy programs might need to be cut to free up capacity. He walked back an earlier comment about axing a hypothetical forty-year-old television program, insisting he was not specifically targeting 7.30 — but made clear that formats that had sustained the ABC in the past may not carry it forward.

The interview also addressed a separate controversy surrounding the hiring of Grace Tame to host an ABC podcast about autism. Melbourne radio host Charlie Pickering had publicly called the decision 'problematic,' citing Tame's remarks describing the rape of Israeli women by Hamas on October 7 as 'propaganda' — comments made during an ABC Radio Sydney interview. Pickering later apologised, saying he had been 'ambushed by a known provocateur' after speaking to a rightwing live streamer. Marks said Pickering's public statements did not breach the ABC's editorial code, and that he had spoken with Tame personally, finding her genuinely opposed to all forms of violence. He encouraged listeners to judge the podcast for themselves.

With Marks now well into his second year, the pace of change at the ABC is accelerating. The departure of Stevens — forced, and without warning — suggests that disagreement with the new direction carries a steep cost. More restructuring, and more difficult choices about what survives, appear to be on the way.

Hugh Marks, the managing director of Australia's ABC, confirmed this week that he had quietly hired a recruitment firm to find a replacement for Justin Stevens, the network's news director, without Stevens knowing any search was underway. The two men had reached an impasse over the future direction of ABC News, Marks explained, and the disagreement left him feeling he had no choice but to look elsewhere. Stevens, who had spent nineteen years building his career at the broadcaster, learned of his replacement only when Marks told him directly: a Reuters executive named Simon Robinson had been hired to take over. Stevens resigned shortly after.

Marks made these revelations during an interview on Radio National Breakfast on Tuesday, speaking with presenter Sally Sara. He framed the secret search as a practical necessity. "We couldn't get agreement on the way forward," he said, describing Stevens as unaware of the recruitment effort. The managing director also used the occasion to signal that far larger changes were coming to the organization. Every leadership position at the ABC was now under review, he indicated, and the broadcaster regularly undertook what he called "extensive succession planning for all of our key executive roles, all the time." The language was measured, but the message was clear: transformation was coming.

Marks pointed to what he characterized as structural problems within the news operation. Resources, he said, were stretched too thin across live news coverage. Some legacy programming—shows that had been part of the ABC's schedule for decades—might have to be discontinued to free up funding and capacity. He had hinted at this direction weeks earlier on a business podcast, mentioning a hypothetical forty-year-old television program that could be axed. When Sara played back that comment during their interview, Marks walked it back slightly, calling his earlier remarks "hypothetical" and clarifying that he was not specifically targeting 7.30, the long-running current affairs show that has been on air for four decades. What he meant, he said, was that the strategies and formats that had sustained the ABC in the past might not be the ones that would carry it forward.

The interview also touched on a separate controversy that had erupted the previous week. Grace Tame, the former Australian of the Year, had been hired by the ABC to host a podcast about autism. The announcement prompted Charlie Pickering, a Melbourne radio host, to publicly call the decision "problematic." Pickering, speaking to a rightwing live streamer named Avi Yemini, expressed concern about what he described as a misunderstanding of certain language and its true meanings, framing his objection through his identity as a Jewish Australian. He later apologized for both the comments about Tame and for having spoken to Yemini at all, saying he had been "ambushed by a known provocateur."

Marks addressed the Tame situation directly. Pickering's public statements, he said, did not violate the ABC's editorial code. Tame had been hired before she made controversial remarks about Israel and Gaza, Marks noted. During an ABC Radio Sydney interview, Tame had referred to the rape of Israeli women by Hamas on October 7, 2023, as "propaganda" and "debunked." Marks acknowledged the controversy surrounding Tame's comments and understood why some people believed she should not have a program on the broadcaster. But he had spoken with Tame himself, he said, and found her to be genuinely opposed to all forms of violence, particularly violence against women and children. The podcast she had produced was worthwhile, he concluded, and he encouraged listeners to hear it for themselves.

With Marks now well into his second year as managing director, the reshaping of the ABC appears to be accelerating. The forced departure of Stevens, a veteran news leader, signals that disagreement with the new direction is not tolerated. The broader organizational review Marks described suggests that more departures and restructuring are likely to follow. The broadcaster faces pressure to do more with less, and Marks has made clear he intends to make difficult choices about which programs and services survive the transition ahead.

Stevens did not know he had begun an international search for a new head of news, but it was necessary because they couldn't get agreement on the way forward
— Hugh Marks, ABC managing director
A better term would have been: what got us to where we are today is not necessarily the things that are going to be successful in the future
— Hugh Marks, clarifying his earlier comments about cutting legacy programming
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why did Marks feel he had to search for Stevens' replacement in secret rather than having a direct conversation first?

Model

Because they couldn't agree on the direction of ABC News. When two leaders at that level reach an impasse, the one with the power to hire and fire often moves to replace rather than negotiate further. Marks saw the disagreement as fundamental—not something that could be resolved through discussion.

Inventor

Stevens had been there nineteen years. Did he have any warning this was coming?

Model

No. Marks told him only after the decision was made and Robinson had been hired. That's the cruelty of it—Stevens wasn't given a chance to fight for his job or even to understand what specifically Marks wanted changed.

Inventor

Marks talks about "legacy programming" needing to go. Is he really willing to cut something like 7.30?

Model

He walked that back when pressed. But the fact that he had to walk it back suggests the idea is on the table. He's signaling that nothing is sacred, that the old way of doing things won't survive his tenure.

Inventor

What about the Grace Tame situation? Does that feel connected to the Stevens story?

Model

Not directly, but it shows the same pattern: Marks making decisions, then defending them when they become controversial. He's not asking permission. He's announcing what's been done and explaining why it's fine.

Inventor

Is Marks in trouble, or is he consolidating power?

Model

He sounds like someone consolidating power. He's moved a veteran out, signaled that all leadership is under review, and framed it all as necessary change. If people disagree, they're either part of the problem or they'll be replaced.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em The Guardian ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ